Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Quality School Plan, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1983No. 82-295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The Commissioner of Revenues for the State of Arkansas brings this appeal from a decree of the Pulaski County Chancery Court wherein it was held that appellee did not owe the assessment for use tax. The commissioner contends the trial court erred in finding the appellee, hereinafter referred to as QSP, was not a “vendor” and did not make a “sale” within the meaning of the Arkansas Compensating Use Tax Act. We agree with the commissioner.

The facts are undisputed. The appellee, QSP, represented about 100 publishers of magazines. Appellee’s agents went to various schools…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. H. & J. Drilling Corp. v. QuallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Gaddy v. DLM, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Quality School Plan, Inc. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pledger v. Troll Book Clubs, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Pledger v. Troll Book Clubs, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Pledger v. Troll Book Clubs, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API