Legal Opinion

United States v. Bell

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1999No. 98-CO-1610PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

In this pretrial government appeal, we review the trial court’s suppression of an audiotaped statement given to the police by appellee Jasmine Bell. Slightly less than six hours after his arrest, Bell signed a card waiving his Miranda 1 rights. Under our case law, that waiver also constituted a waiver of his right under Super. Ct.Crim. R. 5(a) to prompt presentment after the arrest. Bell was then questioned by the police and ten hours later gave the taped statement, incorporating what he had told the police during the questioning period. Presentment, however, did not…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Outlaw v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API