Legal Opinion

Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Tennessee v. Eddins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This suit involves a construction of certain provisions' of a policy of insurance issued by Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Tennessee.

Prior to proceeding to the merits of the controversy it is necessary to dispose of appellee’s motion to strike Bill of Exceptions.

The Final Order (entered April 16, 1974) of the trial court, contains the following recitation:

(T)he defendant is allowed thirty (30) days from the date hereof within which to file his appeal bond, making sufficient sureties, or otherwise comply with the law and ninety (90) days within which to otherwise perfect his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Mason City and Fort Dodge Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad v. St. Joseph Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Branch v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First American Trust Co. v. Franklin-Murray Development Co., L.P.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Spann v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Stidham v. Fickle HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kyte v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance CompaniesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Christine Spann v. Barry Abraham, Individually, and D/B/A Sir PizzaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API