Legal Opinion

Branch v. Branch

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 20, 1952PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, J.

This proceeding is pending on writ of error previously granted by a member of the court who, at the same time, denied certiorari and supersedeas to stay the enforcement of a support allowance for the children of the parties. The case has now been fully argued before the court on the assignment of error that the judgment awarding the allowance is void and of no effect.

More specifically, it is insisted that the allowance was made after the court had divested itself of all jurisdiction in the ease by a dismissal both of the divorce bill of petitioner Boy Anderson Branch and of the cross bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Mason City and Fort Dodge Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad v. St. Joseph Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. John Barb, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. Stidham v. Fickle HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API