Fox v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
The plaintiffs, the husband and wife, recovered a judgment against the defendant for damages sustained by them resulting from personal injuries received by the wife, through the defendant’s alleged negligence.
The facts are briefly these: The defendant’s servant was driving a motor truck, in the daytime, along a public street in Jersey City. This street runs east and west. Lena Pox *727was crossing from the northerly to the southerly side of the street, in a diagonal direction, in the middle of the block and when she had reached about the center…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consolidated Traction Co. v. ChenowithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Mahnken v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Weston Electrical Instrument Co. v. BeneckeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- McAvoy v. Paterson Brewing & Malting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- McKeon v. DelbridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Parave v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Abad v. GagliardiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Cermak v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.