Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. 568 (1959)
147 A.2d 795
PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 16, 1958.
Decided January 19, 1959.
Mr. John E. Hughes argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys).
Mr. Philip L. Nadler argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Pasquale Pipi and Messrs. Gross & Garfield, attorneys; Mr. Isaac Gross and Mr. Victor P. Mullica, on the brief).
2Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed for the…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Newark Passenger Railway Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Kahalili v. Rosecliff Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.