Legal Opinion

Cermak v. Hertz Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 19, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 N.J. 568 (1959)

147 A.2d 795

PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 16, 1958.

Decided January 19, 1959.

Mr. John E. Hughes argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys).

Mr. Philip L. Nadler argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Pasquale Pipi and Messrs. Gross & Garfield, attorneys; Mr. Isaac Gross and Mr. Victor P. Mullica, on the brief).

2Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed for the…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Newark Passenger Railway Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  3. Kahalili v. Rosecliff Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Hughes v. Atlantic City & Shore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API