Legal Opinion
Alco Construction Corp. v. H & S Electric, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1973No. Docket 14591PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBashara, J.
Plaintiff instituted suit against defendant for breach of a contract to install electrical equipment alleging damages in excess of $100,-000. The same day plaintiff filed affidavits for writs of prejudgment garnishment under the authority of GCR 1963, 738.2. The affidavits alleged indebtedness in the same amount as stated in plaintiff’s complaint.
The affidavits further stated:
" * * * that Plaintiff is justly apprehensive of the loss of said sum * * * unless a Writ of Garnishment is issued for the reason that said defendant has failed to pay its debts as they mature and may have incurred *669debts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Talbert v. Solventol Chemical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Goldblum v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers Ford Local No. 50Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Tsingos v. Michigan Packing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Roberts v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- Geistert v. SchefflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- First National Bank v. HastyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- Berrier v. EgelerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- Berar Enterprises, Inc v. HarmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Alco Construction Corp. v. H & S Electric, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973