Kuenzer v. Teamsters Union Local 507
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The essence of appellant’s argument is that the trial judge misapplied Rule 29 of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County (hereinafter “Local Rule 29”). Local Rule 29 states in part: “A case shall be placed upon the Arbitration List when so ordered by a judge at pretrial upon his determining***that the amount actually in controversy* * *is Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or less* * *.” Local rules providing for mandatory arbitration may be adopted pursuant to Rule 15 (formerly Rule 16) of the Rules of Superintendence for Courts of Common Pleas.2
Appellant’s complaint sought $75,000, which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Kalish v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Walters v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Galayda v. Lake Hospital Systems, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Fletcher v. Don Foss of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Galayda v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Sakian v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.