Kalish v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
I
Central to the facts of this case, is what is known, in airline industry parlance, as overbooking. At the root of *75this practice are two adverse designs: airline profit and passenger convenience. First, the most economical method to' operate an airline is to assure the maximum number of passengers on a flight. Second, consumer flexibility in reservations produces last-minute cancellations and “no-shows,” resulting in empty seats, lost revenue and a denial of passage to other prospective passengers.1
In response to the problem, the airline industry attempts to statistically determine the number…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ella Fitzgerald, John Lewis, Georgiana Henry and Norman Granz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Ralph Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Wills v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Mortimer v. Delta Air LinesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Phoenix Lighting Group, L.L.C. v. Genlyte Thomas Group, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Amf, Inc. v. MravecOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Tohline v. Central Trust Co., N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. HaberekOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Davidson v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.