Oden v. State

P®r Curiam.

Appellant, convicted of burglary by the court sitting without a jury, claims that the evidence was insufficient to justify the finding of guilt.

The premises burglarized were those of a vending machine company, and the property stolen was a large number of coins contained in cloth bags. On the day after the breaking and entering, appellant and his brother deposited many coins in a bank, and were arrested soon after. In their possession were two cloth bags definitely and convincingly identified by an official of the vending machine company as having been taken in the burglary. The…