Legal Opinion

Eschena v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1992No. A91A1863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Defendant Anthony Eschena and two co-defendants, Huffman and McKinney, were accused of armed robbery of a convenience store. The co-defendants pled guilty and the pleas were accepted on the condition that they give truthful testimony at defendant Eschena’s trial. Defendant was convicted and appeals.

1. At trial, co-defendant Huffman testified that defendant actively participated in the robbery. Guns and a ski mask identified as those used in the commission of the crime were found in the defendant’s trailer. We reject defendant’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to enable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Barnwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Haygood v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Eshena v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Haygood v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. Tanksley v. FortDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API