Gibson v. Iowa Central Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Cerro Gordo District Court. — IioN. Clieeorj> P. SMITH, Judge. ActioN at law to recover tbe value of a mare killed upon or near defendant’s right of way in the city of Mason City. Trial to a jury, verdict for plaintiff, which was set set aside upon defendant’s motion for a new trial, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
Plaintiff’s petition is in two counts. In the first he asked recovery upon the ground that his animal was killed upon defendant’s right of way at a place where it had the right to fence, .and in the second he sought to hold defendant liable for the negligence of its employes in charge of the train which killed the animal. At the conclusion of the testimony, the trial court, upon motion, directed a verdict for defendant upon the first count, or refused to submit the same to the jury. The second count was submitted, and a verdict was returned for plaintiff, which was afterward set aside on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Neal v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- O'Connor v. Chicago, Rock Island, & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Rhines v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Lathrop v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Williams v. CohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Glanville v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Phillips v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Walters v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Eisentrager v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.