Legal Opinion
A.F. v. Providence Health Plan
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 24, 2016No. Case No. 3:13-cv-00776-SIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Plaintiffs A.F., A.P., S.W., S.S., and I.F. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendant Providence Health Plan (“Providence”) alleging claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et Seq. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion’is granted in part.
*1066STANDARDS
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) provides in relevant part as follows:
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Wells Fargo Erisa 401(K) Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Hugler v. ByrnesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Besang, Inc. v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Ely v. Board of Trustees of the PACE Industry Union-Management Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
- Meyer v. MittalDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.