Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Mittal

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 5, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00621Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASON MEYER, an individual; No. 3:21-cv-00621-HZ ARGIL DX LLC f/k/a ZAP TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC, a OPINION & ORDER Nevada limited liability company; and ARGIL DX, putative partnership, Plaintiffs, v. ANKUR MITTAL, an individual; AXENO CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ARGILDX CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ACCUNITY SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., an Indian private company; and ADX CONSULTING INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants. Katharine Shepherd Adam Rose Rose Law Firm, P.C. 5200 SW Meadows Rd, Ste 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Eric Lang The Lang Legal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API