Legal Opinion
Smith v. David B. Crockett Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 7, 1912PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Action to recover .a balance alleged to be due the plaintiff under a contract for Ms services and allowance for expenses as a salesman, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Gager, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff _ for $1,927, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
Paragraph one of the complaint alleges that on the 6th of April, 1906, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into the following .written agreement:
“April 6, 1906. Agreement made this day between the David B. Crockett Company of Bridgeport, party of the first part, and Mr. G. F. Smith of Milford, Connecticut, party of the second part. The party of the first part agrees to pay the party of the second part the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000) per annum, and if the sales of the said party of the second part reach the sum of tMrteen thousand dollars ($13,000) between the first day of May,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rice v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Fairfield v. LawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- Bollman v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Funk v. GallivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Konover Development Corp. v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Beit v. BeitSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- City of Hartford v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.