Pearsall v. Hyde
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Colbert Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. W. H. Simpson. Bill by Jerry Pearsall against John F. Hyde for an accounting and to redeem land from the mortgage lien. Decree for respondent and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The bill in this case was filed by the appellant against the appellee, and shows that in 1903 the appellant became indebted to the appellee in the sum of about $300 and secured the same by a mortgage upon the lands in controversy. Payments were made from time to time, and credited upon said mortgage. We will hereafter refer to the parties as complainant and respondent.
*87The complainant was also indebted to one Perry, the amount being secured by a mortgage upon two mules; and, default having been made upon said mortgage, said Perry took the mules. The complainant was left without any stock to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bradbury v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Nance v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Douglass v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Parmer v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. Elba Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- DeMoville v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Cross v. Bank of EnsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Richardson v. CurleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Johnson v. ManessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.