Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Curlee
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 30, 1934No. 5 Div. 191PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
It is made to appear from the averments of the bill, as amended, that the appellant, complainant in the court below, owned certain described lands in Elmore county, and exeeutéd two mortgages thereon, one to the First National Bank of Wetumpka, Ala., to secure a loan of $1,080, and the other to W. E. Lacy, to secure an indebtedness of $4,000. After the law day of these mortgages, but while each constituted a valid, legal, and subsisting lien upon the property, they were transferred and assigned to W. B. Curlee, now deceased, and of whose estate the appel-lee A. D. Curlee is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Pickett v. PipkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Flewellen v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Heirs v. United States Bank of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Parmer v. ParmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Groover v. DardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Cousins v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Tiner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- American Liberty Ins. Co. of Birmingham v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Russell v. Praetorians, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.