Coleman v. . Wade
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from the general term of the Superior Court of- the city of New York, where a motion for a new trial had been denied, and a nonsuit, entered upon the trial, affirmed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the general term of the Superior Court of- the city of New York, where a motion for a new trial had been denied, and a nonsuit, entered upon the trial, affirmed. This was an action of assumpsit, commenced in the supreme court, by William Coleman against James Wade and David H. Van Amburgh, as sureties for George Wade, on a lease of a mill and the appurtenances, in Orange county, for the term of one year from the 1st November 1843, at the rent of $650, payable quarterly; with a covenant on the part of the lessee to keep the mill in good order and repair. At the foot of the lease,…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The lease between Coleman and George Wade, provides for the payment of the last quarter's rent on the first of November, 1844.
The defendants, as sureties for George Wade, guarantied the payment of the rent in the manner specified in the lease, and the performance of all other covenants upon the part of their principal.
On the 18th of October, 1844, the lessor and lessee entered into bonds to arbitrate, as to all matters between them, arising out of the demise,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- New York Lumber & Wood Working Co. v. SchniederNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Turner v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Groat v. PrachtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Burhans v. Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- New York Lumber & Wood-working Co. v. SchneiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1890