Legal Opinion

Behr v. Hurwitz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 22, 1918PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin, V. C.

The bill in this cause is filed by the complainant for specific performance of an option or privilege to purchase the lands of Hurwitz and wife contained in a lease from them to the complainant. There are several parties defendants who are mortgagees, and a sublessee for the residue of the term, who have no concern in the controversy beyond the payment of their several mortgage debts, and the peaceable enjoyment of the premises during the term of the sublease. Throughout this opinion Hurwitz and wife will be termed the “defendants.” The other defendants will be referred to by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Stewart v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Collins v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Dunlap v. BullardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Gassert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Holmes v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Banks Auto Parts, Inc. v. Banks Investments I, LC (In Re Banks Auto Parts, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API