Legal Opinion

Venable v. Grage

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1967No. 42777PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The court’s ruling on the appellants’ first motion for summary judgment is not res judicata in their present appeal. On the appeal of the appellants’ summary judgments the judgments were reversed on jurisdictional grounds not involving the merits of the grant of the summary judgments. It is too well settled to require citation of authority that the rulings in a case on technical grounds, not involving the merits do not constitute the law of the case. Besides, the additional motions involve additional material and in our view the court did not abuse its discretion in considering and deciding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Suggs v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Walker v. Small Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gregory v. Vance Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Sams v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Perkins v. P. L. W., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Roberson v. Evergreen & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. King v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API