Suggs v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
It was not error for the trial court to overrule the plaintiff’s demurrers to the defendants’ amendments. A litigant may at any stage of the cause amend his pleadings either in form or substance. Code Ann. § 81-301. It will be shown in another division of this opinion that article 30 of the firemen’s employment agreement was applicable in this case.
The overruling of the defendants’ first motions for summary judgments was not a bar to their second motions for the reason that the first motions did not require a decision as to the applicability of article 30 of the employment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lambert v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Charles v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Johnson v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Marshall v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
3Cited by21 opinions
- Modern Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- McLean v. CONTINENTAL WINGATE CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Gregory v. Vance Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Keller Building Products of Atlanta, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. Briggs Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.