Legal Opinion

State v. McFarland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2011No. 06CR0797; A139991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for identity theft, ORS 165.800. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the case for lack of a speedy trial under ORS 135.747. That statute requires dismissal of criminal proceedings when a defendant is “not brought to trial within a reasonable period of time.” The trial court concluded that the 17-month delay between defendant’s indictment and his arraignment was reasonable. On review for errors of law, State v. Johnson, 339 Or 69, 74-87, 116 P3d 879 (2005), we reverse and remand for entry of a judgment of dismissal.

We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. DavidsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. BircherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. DanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API