State v. McFarland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for identity theft, ORS 165.800. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the case for lack of a speedy trial under ORS 135.747. That statute requires dismissal of criminal proceedings when a defendant is “not brought to trial within a reasonable period of time.” The trial court concluded that the 17-month delay between defendant’s indictment and his arraignment was reasonable. On review for errors of law, State v. Johnson, 339 Or 69, 74-87, 116 P3d 879 (2005), we reverse and remand for entry of a judgment of dismissal.
We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. VawterOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. GLUSHKOOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. DavidsOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. BircherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. DanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012