Legal Opinion

Schele v. Wagner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1904No. 20,335PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom the Allen .Circuit Court; Edward O'Rourke, Judge. Claim filed by August Scheie against Henry Wagner, as administrator “of the estate of Claude E. Erne, deceased. Erom a judgment denying the claim, claimant appeals. Transferred from Appelate Court under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

—

This action is based on a promissory note filed by appellant as a claim against the estate of Claude Erne, deceased, of which appellee is the administrator. The note purports to have been executed by Elizabeth Kanning to Erne & Son, a partnership composed of the decedent and his son Julius- Erne, doing, business as insurance, real estate, and loan brokers, and by said firm indorsed to appellant. Among other things, it is alleged in the complaint that a part of the business of the firm of Erne & Son was to secure loans for clients; that one of their methods in negotiating and securing loans…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deardorf's Administrator v. ThacherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Smith v. SloanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Dowling v. Exchange Bank of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Bays v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Zeller v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deeter v. BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Schumacher v. the Sumner Tele. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API