Legal Opinion
Floyd-Mayers v. American Cab Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-1777 (CRR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are suing American Cab Company (“American”), alleging that drivers in taxicabs bearing American’s colors and markings refused to provide service to plaintiffs on account of their race in violation of, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. American has filed a motion for summary judgment. The Court will deny the summary judgment motion because: (1) one of American’s arguments to negate vicarious liability is estopped as a matter of law while the other involves disputed issues of material fact; and (2) administrative exhaustion is not a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rose Ann Wilkerson, Ray Wilkerson and Sharon Sutton v. Harold Johnson, Fred Bush, Roy "Bud" Nail, Jr., and Lola WooldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell v. DCX, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Greene v. Amritsar Auto Services Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Davis v. Megabus Ne. LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- National Harbor Gp, LLC v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Davis v. Megabus Northeast, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.