Ohio Department of Human Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Dissatisfied with a final determination in which the United States Department of Health and Human Services disapproved Ohio Medicaid State Plan Amendment No. 84-2, the State of Ohio has petitioned for review of that determination under 42 U.S. C. § 1316.
The Plan Amendment would liberalize Ohio’s formula for determining how much money should be allocated from Medicaid funds, in effect, for maintenance and support of non-institutionalized spouses of institutionalized Medicaid recipients. Health and Human Services disapproved Ohio’s proposal on the basis of a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. KnollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Michael J. Friedrich v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5380, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8755 Chief Probation Officers of California, and the County of Santa Barbara, California v. Donna Shalala, Mary Jo Bane, and Lavinia Limon, in Their Official Capacities, Department of Health and Human Services and Administration for Children and FamiliesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Duke Energy CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.