Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Railroad Retirement Board
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 12, 2024No. 8:24-cv-00051Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff, 8:24CV51 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. In this action, plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of an order by defendant U.S. Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) granting “party” status to the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division – International Brotherhood of Teamsters (BMWED) for purposes of an upcoming administrative hearing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Elgin v. Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.