Legal Opinion

Ruggio v. Ditkowsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 26, 1986No. 2-85-1026PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strouse

Plaintiff, S. Frank Ruggio, brought this action for common law contribution to compel defendant, Burton Ditkowsky, as joint obligor, to contribute his share of two notes paid by plaintiff. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment for plaintiff.

Both plaintiff and defendant had known and done business with Louis Patras, who was the owner of the William Tell Restaurant. Plaintiff owns an insurance brokerage, S. Frank Ruggio and Sons, Inc., which sold fire and casualty insurance to the restaurant and automobile insurance to Patras, individually. Society Linen Supply, Inc., of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MurrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schoenberger v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. La Grange Metal Products v. Pettibone Mulliken Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Laff v. John O. Butler Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Rivinius, Inc., Debtor. Rivinius, Inc., Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant v. Cross Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant-Counterplaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Israel v. National Canada Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Wilmette Partners v. HamelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Lowe v. KangAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. F D L Foods, Inc. v. Kokesch Trucking, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API