Legal Opinion

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Chocolate Shop, Inc.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 1515—5817PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCeitz, J.

We refer to the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for a full statement of the nature and result of this case. 30 S.W.(2d) 416.

The application for this writ contains five assignments of error, but they all' amount to one contention, which is, that the verdict of the jury is tainted with misconduct, in that the jury first agreed on a re%ult to be accomplished by the verdict, and then designedly framed their answers to the several questions propounded so as to accomplish the agreed result. In connection with the above, it is further contended by the plaintiff in error that the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. ColeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. Chocolate Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HearksTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Besteiro v. BesteiroTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Beaumont, S. L. & W. R. v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Waggoman v. Fort Worth Well Machinery & Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. James A. Dick Co. v. YanezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API