Legal Opinion
Hacienda Valley Mobile Estates, a California Limited Partnership v. City of Morgan Hill City of Morgan Hill Rent Review Opinion Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2003No. 02-15986PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUG, JR., Circuit Judge:
Hacienda Valley Mobile Estates (“Hacienda”) brought this action to challenge the constitutionality of the City of Morgan Hill’s (“City’s”) vacancy control ordinance, Ordinance No. 1090 (“Ordinance”). The Ordinance prevents mobile home parks from raising the rent on a mobile home “pad” when the mobile home is sold. Hacienda alleges that the Ordinance allows existing tenants to capture a “premium” on the sales price of their mobile homes because the new tenants are guaranteed low rent. Hacienda argues that this premium is an unconstitutional taking.
District Judge…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. County of San Luis ObispoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.