Legal Opinion
United States v. $396,589 in U.S. Funds
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 4, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17-587 (RBW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The government brings this civil forfeiture action in rem against the defendant property, $396,589 in U.S. funds (the "defendant funds"), arising out of an investigation of Royal Pearls General Trading ("Royal Pearls") and several other entities. See Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem ("Compl.") at 1. Currently pending before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Order of Forfeiture ("Gov't's Mot."). Upon careful consideration of the relevant submissions,1 the Court concludes that it must grant the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Adkins v. TeseoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Auxier Drywall, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Boland v. ELITE TERRAZZO FLOORING, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. $6, 999, 925.00 of Funds Associated With Velmur Mgmt. Pte LTDCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- United States v. $6,999,925.00 of Funds Associated With Velmur Management Pte LtdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. $6,999,925.00 of Funds Associated With Velmur Management Pte LtdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019