Legal Opinion

Kinnison v. City of San Antonio

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided July 21, 2010No. 2:08-mj-00421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

On the date, the Court considered Defendants J. Barry Archer, Mike Constantino, and Reyes Hernandez’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 99), Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 100), Defendant City of San Antonio’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 101), the Defendants’ objections and motion to exclude the affidavit attached to Plaintiffs response (Docket No. 107), and the responses and replies thereto. The individual Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, the Defendant City’s motion is…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Como v. CITY OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2011
  2. Aaron Wolber v. Round Rock Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API