Legal Opinion
Lockhart v. Draper
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2009No. S-12868, S-12838PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Earl Lockhart ("Lockhart") appeals from a judgment of the superior court awarding punitive damages against him for his role as the recipient of a fraudulent conveyance. The judgment awarded Duane Draper, Michael Draper, Denise Gauthier, and Diane Baker (collectively "Draper") punitive damages of $24,000, prejudgment interest of $14,183.67, and attorney's fees of $4,820. Draper cross-appeals.
On May 15, 2007, the Honorable Gregory J. Motyka, superior court judge pro tem, entered a written order explaining the facts and procedural setting of the case and making findings of fact and…
3Cases cited34 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Peggy Kimzey, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Nabours v. Longview Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Haskins v. SheldenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Merdes & Merdes, P.C. v. Leisnoi, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- LEWIS-WALUNGA v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- LEWIS-WALUNGA v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011