Legal Opinion

State v. Bird

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2015No. 20120906PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

11 On certiorari, we are asked to review the court of appeals' ruling that the trial court erred by not providing a mens rea jury instruction for the charge of failure to respond to an officer's signal to stop under Utah Code section 41-6a-210. We are also asked to determine whether the court of appeals erred by failing to provide guidance on remand regarding a correct jury instruction. We affirm the court of appeals, but exercise our discretion to provide such guidance.

BACKGROUND

T2 On the evening of October 12, 2009, Salt Lake City police…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. CoboUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. BluffUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. State v. SquiresCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. State v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. State v. EyreUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. Nunez-VazquezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API