Legal Opinion

United States v. Gray

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 19, 2003No. CRIM.00-157, CRIM.02-45PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Now before the Court are the New Trial Motions filed by Kevin Gray (“Gray”), Rodney Moore (“Moore”), John Raynor (“Raynor”), Timothy Handy (“Handy”), and Lionel Nunn (“Nunn”). Also, before the Court are the Government’s Omnibus Opposition to Defendants’ Motions for New Trial, and Kevin Gray’s Reply to the Government’s Opposition to His Motion for New Trial.

Upon consideration of the foregoing motions, the applicable law, and the record in this case, the Court, hereby, DENIES, the New Trial Motions filed by the aforementioned defendants.

BACKGR…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. CoughlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. United States v. Catalan-RomanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
  5. United States v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API