Legal Opinion

United States v. Coughlin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 7, 2011No. Criminal Action 08-334 (RCL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion [159] for a new trial and Motion for a judgment of acquittal. Upon consideration of the defendant’s Motion, the government’s response [162], the defendant’s reply [164], the applicable law, and the entire record in this case, the Court will deny defendant’s Motion for a new trial and Motion for a judgment of acquittal for the reasons set forth below.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Coughlin’s September 11th Victim Compensation Fund Claim

Defendant Charles Coughlin, a United States naval officer, was working at the Pentagon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Bowie, JuanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. United States v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. CoughlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. United States v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API