Legal Opinion

Redmond v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 4, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2214Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JESSE R. REDMOND, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-2214 (CKK) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 4, 2019) Plaintiff Jesse R. Redmond, proceeding pro se, alleges that Defendant United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) has infringed on his Fifth Amendment rights in various ways relating to the Commission’s past denials of parole for Redmond. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s [10] Motion to Dismiss, which argues in part that this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to hear this case…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API