In the Interest of S. N.

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

The mother and father of sixteen-year-old S. N. and nine-year-old J. L. appeal the juvenile court’s termination of their parental rights.1 They argue that there was insufficient evidence to support the termination and that the court erred by not considering placing the children with the parents of the mother’s ex-husband. Finding no error, we affirm.

In considering this appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s disposition. We determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the…