Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D. S.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 2001No. A00A2530PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Appellant, the natural mother of D. S. and R. S., appeals from the termination of her parental rights. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. For the reasons set forth, we affirm the termination order of the juvenile court.

In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a termination of parental rights case, we review the evidence in the *570light most favorable to the judgment of the juvenile court and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s rights have been lost. In the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. In the Interest of A. M. V.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. In the Interest of D. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. In the Interest of C. N. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. In the Interest of K. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In the Interest of T. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. In the Interest of S. L. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. In the Interest of T. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. In the Interest of L. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. In the Interest of T. A. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API