Tenaha Licensing LLC v. Ascom (US) Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TENAHA LICENSING LLC, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No.19-568-LPS-SRF ASCOM (US) INC., Defendant. ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action for patent infringement, arguing that the asserted patent claims are ineligible under
35 U.S.C. § 101
because they are directed to an abstract idea. (D.I. 6)! Defendant also argues that the Complaint’s allegations of indirect patent infringement are insufficient and should be dismissed. (D.I. 7 at 19-20) As explained below,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.