Legal Opinion

Haines v. Hayden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1893PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to-Kent. (Adsit, J.) Appeal from the probate of a will'. Proponent brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

' Montgomery, J.

On tbe 25th day of June, 1891, James H. Brown died, at the age of 84, leaving an estate amounting to about $100,000. He had on the 10th day of February, 1881, executed in due form an instrument as and for his last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate in the probate court. On appeal to the circuit court of Kent county a contest was made on the two grounds of mental incapacity of the testator, and undue influence-exerted by the proponent, Margaret L. Haines.

The proponent and contestant are full sisters. At the time of the execution of the will the wife and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Waterman v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rivard v. RivardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Miller v. LivingstoneUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. In re Merriman's AppealMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API