Cooke v. Seligman
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Motion to Remand.
1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.
Although the complaint avers that Wostenholme owns a number of the bonds, it does not aver that he makes any claim in respect of them, on account of any matters alleged in the bill as matters on account of which the plaintiff makes a claim in respect of bonds. Nor does the plaintiff sue on behalf of Wostenholme, or claim to represent him as respects any claim made on the other defendants, or any of them. On the whole scope of the bill, the words “ similarly situated, ” in the preamble to the complaint, and in paragraphs 14 and 16, and in subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 of the prayer, mean the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Amory v. AmorySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burdick v. HaleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1876
- Head v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Preston v. McNeil Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1906