Amory v. Amory
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to tbe Superior Court of tbe city of New York. The facts are stated'in thej opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
These cases are substantially disposed of by the decision in Insurance Company v. Pechner, supra, p. 183. They each present the question of the sufficiency of a petition for removal under the act of March 2, 1867, 14 Stat. 558. The suits were in New York by the defendants in error as exeeutors, against the plaintiff in error, a citizen of New Jersey. The petitions for removal set'forth sufficiently the citizenship of the plaintiff in error, but as to' the defendants-, in error the allegations are “ that said plaintiffs, as such executors, are' citizens of the State of New York/’ Clearly this…
2Cited by59 opinions
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Continental Insurance v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- B. & O. Railroad v. P. W. & Ky. RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Eaton v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- State ex rel. Mills v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.