Legal Opinion

People v. Reed

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1922No. Crim. No. 861PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Defendant and one Michael J. Malone were jointly informed against in two counts. One of these charged grand larceny and the other charged burglary, the two alleged offenses arising out of the same transaction. Defendant was tried alone and was acquitted on the grand larceny charge, but was convicted on the burglary charge. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial of the cause.

Appellant contends that the evidence against him was insufficient to sustain the verdict holding him guilty of the burglary charge. There was no evidence directly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. BraswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API