Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 19, 2010No. 09-0271/AFPublished

1DissentBaker, Judge

I agree with the majority opinion that “[t]he due process principle of fair notice mandates that ‘an accused has a right to know what offense and under what legal theory’ he will be convicted; an LIO [lesser included offense] meets this notice requirement if ‘it is a subset of the greater offense alleged.’ ” United States v. Jones, 68 M.J. at 468 (C.A.A.F.2010) (quoting United States v. Medina, 66 M.J. 21, 26-27 (C.A.A.F.2008)). I also agree that “‘[t]he Constitution requires that an accused be on notice as to the offense that must be defended against, and that only lesser included offenses…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API