United States v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentBaker, Judge
I agree with the majority opinion that “[t]he due process principle of fair notice mandates that ‘an accused has a right to know what offense and under what legal theory’ he will be convicted; an LIO [lesser included offense] meets this notice requirement if ‘it is a subset of the greater offense alleged.’ ” United States v. Jones, 68 M.J. at 468 (C.A.A.F.2010) (quoting United States v. Medina, 66 M.J. 21, 26-27 (C.A.A.F.2008)). I also agree that “‘[t]he Constitution requires that an accused be on notice as to the offense that must be defended against, and that only lesser included offenses…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dames & Moore v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.