Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1972No. 10953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court of Idaho City of the offense of “failure to connect to a sewer in violation of Ordinance No. 106, Idaho City.” Defendant appealed the judgment of conviction and in a trial de novo was again convicted in the district court. Defendant has appealed from that judgment of conviction to this court alleging several matters in which the district court committed error.

The record discloses the following facts:

On April 25, 1969, the City of Idaho City enacted Ordinance No. 106, the title of which reads as follows:

“An Ordinance Discontinuing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PiggeIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Nielson v. City of GoodingIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Garrity v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. HahnIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Dakota Lee VillafuerteIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. McNaryIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API