Legal Opinion

State v. Dakota Lee Villafuerte

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2016No. Docket 42766-2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal out of Canyon County from a judgment of conviction for the defendant’s failure to update his address information in the sex offender registry. He appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss on the ground that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the charge. Based upon the state of the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we do not address the defendant’s assertion that he had changed his address to a place outside the State of Idaho before he was required to update his information in the registry.

I

Factual Background.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BaconIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. SheehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API