Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1965No. Crim. 9911PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

In a nonjury trial the defendants King and Davis were found guilty of possession of marijuana in violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code. They were sentenced to be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for the term prescribed by law. Each defendant has appealed from the judgment pronounced against him.

Two questions must be resolved. The first is whether the police officers obtained the marijuana by means of an illegal search and seizure. The second question relates to the impact of the reasoning of People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361], upon…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. BerutkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. WillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API