Legal Opinion

Bardwell v. Ziegler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1891No. 304PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court Spokane County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

By written contract between the parties; plaintiffs agreed to furnish defendant certain materials to be used in finishing a building in Spokane; certain of the materials to be furnished on board the cars at Minneapolis, on or before the 15th day of December, 1889, and certain other materials, to wit, the doors and paneled wainscoting and stairs, on or before the first day of January, 1890, and this provision occurs in the contract:

“And the second party, for and in consideration of the first party’s completely and faithfully executing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart Howell v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Partridge v. The Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Sawtelle v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Davis v. GalloupeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Sanford v. RawlingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Pfeiffer v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Kerr v. CochranWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. French v. Seattle Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API