Legal Opinion

Lowenstein v. Murray

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

229 N.J. Super. 616 (1988)

552 A.2d 245

JAMES I. LOWENSTEIN, PLAINTIFF,

v.

PETER MURRAY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Essex County.

November 15, 1988.

James I. Lowenstein plaintiff pro se.

Leroy Rawls for defendant (pursuant to R. 1:21-3(b)).

FAST, J.S.C.

The issue involved in this action has not been reported in New Jersey. It requires N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1i to be harmonized with N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.2e.

Plaintiff is defendant's landlord. Plaintiff served defendant with a proposed lease renewing an existing tenancy, together with a "Revised Notice Of Changes In Terms & Substance Of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harry's Village, Inc. v. Egg Harbor TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. RWB Newton Associates v. GunnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. SDG v. Inventory Control Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Kroll Realty, Inc. v. FuentesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. M.C. Associates v. ShahNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muros v. MoralesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  2. Sacks Realty Co. v. BatchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Prospect Point Gardens Inc. v. TimoshenkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API