Legal Opinion

Prospect Point Gardens Inc. v. Timoshenko

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 12, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAYSER, J.T.C.,

(temporarily assigned).

The central issue presented in this case is whether a landlord loses his right to maintain an action under the notice requirements of N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1f when he integrates notice of a rental increase with other substantive changes in tenant’s renewal lease. This issue has not been dealt with in any reported decisions.

The essential facts are not in dispute. On December 15, 1995, the defendants were served with a written notice terminating tenancy and demanding possession of their residential apartment on the last day of their lease term, February 1,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. 447 ASSOCIATES v. MirandaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Stamboulos v. McKeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Harry's Village, Inc. v. Egg Harbor TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. RWB Newton Associates v. GunnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Montgomery Gateway v. HerreraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fromet Properties, Inc. v. BuelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API